Can GPT-4 Models Detect Misleading Visualizations?
Jason Huang Alexander - University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States
Priyal H Nanda - University of Masssachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States
Kai-Cheng Yang - Northeastern University, Boston, United States
Ali Sarvghad - University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States
Screen-reader Accessible PDF
Room: Bayshore VI
2024-10-17T18:12:00ZGMT-0600Change your timezone on the schedule page
2024-10-17T18:12:00Z
Fast forward
Full Video
Keywords
Misleading visualizations, GPT-4, large vision language model, misinformation
Abstract
The proliferation of misleading visualizations online, particularly during critical events like public health crises and elections, poses a significant risk of misinformation. This work investigates the capability of GPT-4 models (4V, 4o, and 4o mini) to detect misleading visualizations. Utilizing a dataset of tweet-visualization pairs with various visual misleaders, we tested these models under four experimental conditions with different levels of guidance. Our results demonstrate that GPT-4 models can detect misleading visualizations with moderate accuracy without prior training (naive zero-shot) and that performance considerably improves by providing the model with the definitions of misleaders (guided zero-shot). Our results indicate that a single prompt engineering technique does not necessarily yield the best results for all types of misleaders. We found that guided few-shot was more effective for reasoning misleaders, while guided zero-shot performed better for design misleaders. This study underscores the feasibility of using large vision-language models to combat misinformation and emphasizes the importance of optimizing prompt engineering to enhance detection accuracy.